Menu Bar
cheezsteak's Comments
Re: Palin Flat out Lying to America 10-13-08
What does this have to do with McCain as mentioned in the intro?
By: cheezsteak
Re: McCain Tries to Tame Flames He Earlier Fanned
EDIT: First sentance
"...McCain [DOESN'T] always agree..."
There, now it makes sense.
"...McCain [DOESN'T] always agree..."
There, now it makes sense.
By: cheezsteak
Re: McCain Tries to Tame Flames He Earlier Fanned
I always believed that McCain always agree with the GOP and that he was bipartisan. However, do you think that the GOP want bipartisanship? Hells no. They're a political party for christssake. So the notion that the GOP would allow McCain to be bipartisan is absurd, but they will gladly promote that he was because of the anti-bush sentimate.
So he is a maverick but the GOP just don't want him to be. That's why, in his speaches, he talks about his past, which is impressive, but not about his plans, which contradict his past.
The final testimate to him being a GOP tool is the nomination of Sarah Palin, who has been fanning those flames more than anyone. --It's all she talks about now.-- If McCain was such a Maverick he would have picked Joe Lieberman for VP as he originally wanted to instead of Sarah Palin.
So he is a maverick but the GOP just don't want him to be. That's why, in his speaches, he talks about his past, which is impressive, but not about his plans, which contradict his past.
The final testimate to him being a GOP tool is the nomination of Sarah Palin, who has been fanning those flames more than anyone. --It's all she talks about now.-- If McCain was such a Maverick he would have picked Joe Lieberman for VP as he originally wanted to instead of Sarah Palin.
By: cheezsteak
Re: The McCain-Palin Mob
An IQ test for voters would be unconstitutional under section 1 of the fourteenth amendment. - But you know that.
However the Reproduction IQ test is 100% constitutional. It says nothing even related to it. I say all systems go.
However the Reproduction IQ test is 100% constitutional. It says nothing even related to it. I say all systems go.
By: cheezsteak
Re: The McCain-Palin Mob
"Imagine if a Republican candidate had a similar relationship to a leader of the KKK."
Robert Byrd: Senior senator from the state of West Virginia and longest serving current senator in DC.
>>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_C._Byrd<<
Robert Byrd: Senior senator from the state of West Virginia and longest serving current senator in DC.
>>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_C._Byrd<<
By: cheezsteak
Re: Conservatives Blame McCain As Obama Landslide Approaches
Oh LAWL, McCain is too much of a "Maverick" for them.
By: cheezsteak
Re: Zeitgeist: Addendum
"while you think your brand of computer or car mean something"
I never said anything like that. The only thing that I said I valued was love which you keep interperting as sex.
"Stop commenting for the sake of commenting, that's passive aggressive"
wtf are you doing? You think that my reason for commenting is just to comment? If I was doing that I would have just resorted to "NO U"
I never said anything like that. The only thing that I said I valued was love which you keep interperting as sex.
"Stop commenting for the sake of commenting, that's passive aggressive"
wtf are you doing? You think that my reason for commenting is just to comment? If I was doing that I would have just resorted to "NO U"
By: cheezsteak
Re: Zeitgeist: Addendum
Well if they don't agree with, him like you say, then I would like to hear it from them not from him. Unless he backtracks on his views from the first video, or there is no common issue between the two videos -which I believe there is regarding coporate america-, I can't take the beliefs of someone who believes so many false things seriously.
I'm glad that you didn't buy into his first video. But I would disagree with you on that it was meant to be a "could be" video. Joseph most certainly meant serious business with it, and even promoted, on his website, May 15 to be "Zeitgeist Day" were we would all spring up and spread the 'truth' to the world.
It was an imaginative veiw, but not on his part. He just read a plethora of conspiracy theorists, and felt that their research was credible enough to cite as fact.
I'm glad that you didn't buy into his first video. But I would disagree with you on that it was meant to be a "could be" video. Joseph most certainly meant serious business with it, and even promoted, on his website, May 15 to be "Zeitgeist Day" were we would all spring up and spread the 'truth' to the world.
It was an imaginative veiw, but not on his part. He just read a plethora of conspiracy theorists, and felt that their research was credible enough to cite as fact.
By: cheezsteak
Re: Zeitgeist: Addendum
If your reason for living is so purley for the evolutionary survival of our species, then you need to rethink your life. As in find a girl to love; love as in compassion, not sex, as you somehow took it.
I don't know why your so offended that you are willing to insult me by using something, which I have already apologized for, against me. Possibly because you believe Peter Joeseph so much that you made,
"We're not gonna make it and it's all your fault" your 'about me:' and you can't stand to have the person who dictated your beliefs challenged. So you will continue to stubbornly reply with unnecessary insults.
BTW I do know how to ctrl+c ctrl+v that's what I did and shouldn't have done in the previous post, learn2read.
I don't know why your so offended that you are willing to insult me by using something, which I have already apologized for, against me. Possibly because you believe Peter Joeseph so much that you made,
"We're not gonna make it and it's all your fault" your 'about me:' and you can't stand to have the person who dictated your beliefs challenged. So you will continue to stubbornly reply with unnecessary insults.
BTW I do know how to ctrl+c ctrl+v that's what I did and shouldn't have done in the previous post, learn2read.
By: cheezsteak
Re: Zeitgeist: Addendum
I never said deja vu was a bad thing.
http://www.thevenusproject.com/
This is what he refers to right?
http://www.thevenusproject.com/
This is what he refers to right?
By: cheezsteak
Re: Zeitgeist: Addendum
Forgot to edit out the first 'critical thinking sentence' I meant to cut and paste that into the second paragraph not copy paste
sorry if it sounds repetitive.
sorry if it sounds repetitive.
By: cheezsteak
Re: Zeitgeist: Addendum
Excuse me for not watching the movie. I can't trust anything he says again after his first tirade of lies.
Just because there are other people who agree with him doesn't make him right. How many experts disagree?
Your arguement against the money system is deja vu of a metaphor from Ron Paul and only has one point of connection. Metaphors aren't arguements they're clarification. Besides we don't have a money system, we have a credit system. Money is only a representation of credit. A material based economy would not account for the value of effort or ideas, whereas the credit system does. The amount of wealth would only increase with the amount of our limited materials gathered. It's a flawed system from an idealist who lacks critical thinking.
Just because there are other people who agree with him doesn't make him right. How many experts disagree?
Your arguement against the money system is deja vu of a metaphor from Ron Paul and only has one point of connection. Metaphors aren't arguements they're clarification. Besides we don't have a money system, we have a credit system. Money is only a representation of credit. A material based economy would not account for the value of effort or ideas, whereas the credit system does. The amount of wealth would only increase with the amount of our limited materials gathered. It's a flawed system from an idealist who lacks critical thinking.
By: cheezsteak
15th
"Section 1. The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude.
Section 2. The Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation."
Voting is not a right; it is a privilege. The amendment strictly prohibits banning voting based on "race, color, or previous condition of servitude" Not intellegence, and it does not GRANT any right to vote.
But since voting is a privilege. the fourteenth says:
"No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; ..."
So therefore the voting IQ test is unconstitutional. Actually, it says states not National Government. So maybe we can on a national level.
As for reproduction, the arguement can be made that it is a privilege. However the US Constitution does not say anything on the subject.